I posted the following to a forum recently, but I figured I’d just post it here as well, and then I don’t have to write it again if I get mad at some other dumbass on some other forum (why do I allow myself to be ensnared by trolls? Mainly I think I find ranting very theraputic…)
Sony has an amazing PR machine. As an actual game developer, I want to throw in my 77 Kwachas:
1) Game developers are more likely to choose 720p over 1080p because at 720p you waste less graphics time drawing all those damn pixels, and can invest that time instead in making the graphics themselves better, with more polygons, more complex shaders, more effects and particles, etc. Not to mention the fact that most HDTV’s don’t even support 1080p yet.
2) PS3’s backwards compatibility is software, and will have the same problems as the 360.
3) Microsoft got the online experience right, and Sony really hasn’t shown anything yet that could compete in the US with the 360’s Xbox Live.
4) The CELL processor is a new arcitecture, but it isn’t going to have your Sony brand TV, home theatre, cell phone, watch, etc all sharing processor resources. The PS3 is a single, self-contained gaming console, just like the 360, the Wii, the XBox, the PS2, the PS1, etc.
5) Blu-ray is not going to give developers 50 gigs to work with, it’s going to give them 25 gigs to work with. Just like DVD’s, a dual layer disc is more expensive to print than two single layer discs. Also, I don’t think they actually make dual layer blu-ray discs for commercial products yet, because it’s too expensive to make. Note that HD-DVD doesn’t share this problem, as existing DVD manufacturing plants can be easily upgraded to support HD-DVD. Also, I don’t mean to say that 25 gigs isn’t a lot of space, it’s just another example of the hype out performing reality.
6) At first PS3 was said to be too expensive, but then studies showing old console prices adjusted for inflation made it look like it wasn’t too expensive. That argument is crap. First of all, the PS3 is still MORE expensive than it’s competition. Second, back in the late 80’s, my family bought a bare-bones Apple IIGS for $1400. After inflation that comes out to more than $2200. Would I spend that much on the latest computer today? Hell no, I’d get a Dell XPS 410 with a 19″ LCD for $990. My point is that you are comparing apples and oranges, and the only thing that matters is how much people are willing to shell out today. And I think for most people, $600 is too much to pay for a video game console.
Having said that, I do think that pre-ordering a PS3 is a good investment, because there will not be enough to go around, and I bet they’ll be selling on e-bay for quite a markup…
In the end, the games are the most important things, as that is really where the fun is had. So if you are going to have the most fun with games that are only available on the PS3, then you will probably end up with a PS3. Personally, I’m much more excited about the Wii right now…